Friday, May 18, 2012

Florida Homestead Law: From the Beginning

Besides the sugar white sands, emerald waters and a population that has a rather inexplicable obsession with monkeys, one of the perks to living in Florida is our homestead law.   In order to understand how homestead works, it is easiest to look at the law in the context of how it began. First, you have to know what it is, though.

Homestead protection is available to any real property owned by an individual that is their place of abode (and if temporarily absent, where they intend to return).  Inside the city limits, an individual may homestead up to a half acre of contiguous property.  Outside city limits, up to 160 acres of contiguous property may be homesteaded.   That's pretty much it:  the property has to be within the size limitations stated above, and it has to be where you live.   Without doing anything else, it is your homestead.  There's no form to fill out or registration to make, it just is. In order to get the full benefit of the homestead laws, you do have to take some action (which I will address later on in this post).

So, to the background.  Florida homestead law is thought to derive from the influence of Spanish colonial laws and the Civil War.  Context is everything right?  A little state history: Spain ceded ownership of Florida to the USA in 1819.  Florida became a state in 1845.  Florida, to our great shame, was a slave holding state.  In 1861, Florida seceded from the Union. During the Civil War, Florida was a supplier of salt, cattle, and men to the Confederacy. There were battles fought in Florida. Men went to war, and some of them never returned. At the time, there was no homestead law. The displacement of widows and children by creditors or family members must have been massive. Survival in the 1860's without the support of a husband was a major obstacle for any woman, whether or not she was also a mother.

Florida was readmitted to the Union in 1868 with a new constitution, usually referred to as the "Reconstruction Charter."  It was in this version of the Florida Constitution that the first homestead provisions appeared at Article IX.  The law protected the homestead from "forced sale" both during a man's life and even after his death.  The law also prohibited the "alienation" of the homestead by deed or mortgage without the wife's consent.  This consent provision was crucial.  Lastly, the law provided that the homestead descended to the wife and/or minor children and prevented the husband from deviating from this distribution by alternate devise in his Will.  In case it is bothering you, the gender specific terms used in this post are intentional.

Why was the consent provision so crucial and why was it so hard for a widow?  At the time the Reconstruction Charter was adopted, Florida did not have a Married Women's Property Act.  As hard as it is to fathom today, 150 years ago all of a woman's belongings (as well as the woman herself) became the property of her husband upon marriage.  A married woman could not own property:  chattel can't own chattel.  If not for the social stigma then attached to single parenting or "spinsterhood" I have to think many women would have given a hearty "NO THANKS" to any marriage proposals.  Florida was the last of four states to enact a Married Women's Property Act in 1943, almost 100 years after the first one was enacted.  Shameful, but not shocking.  Florida as a state has not been exactly "forward thinking" on women's rights.  Consider that Florida was dead last in ratification of the 19th Amendment to the US Constitution (women's right to vote), a full FIFTY YEARS after the amendment was passed into law.  Way to go, Florida legislature.  I procrastinate, but dang, that takes the cake and the candles.

So, the homestead law was therefore very important to a widow and her children, protecting them from creditors of the husband as well as the husband during the husband's life.  The law also protected the widow and children from the husband's Will, or his family, or his creditors after his death.  

The law remained pretty much unchanged until the Great Depression.  Many Floridians lost their homes within the first few years of the Great Depression because they could not pay their ad valorem (real estate) taxes.  So, the constitution was amended to add an ad valorem tax exemption for homesteads.  Originally, the exempt amount was $5,000 of the fair market value.  In order to get the benefit of the ad valorem tax exemption, you have to declare your homestead.  Your local Property Appraiser's office can clue you in on the specifics.  Here's a link to the contact info for all property appraisers in Florida by county.   Here's a link to the State's information page on homestead.  Here's a link to the current Homestead constitutional provision (Article X, Section 4).  

One misconception about homestead law is that it makes your homestead inviolate.  Not so.  If you apply for Medicaid assistance, only the first $500,000 in equity is exempt.  If you instruct the Personal Representative of your estate to sell your homestead in your will, then it loses homestead protection.  The IRS can always wade in and take it on a federal lien (Federal law trumps state law), a materialman can foreclose a Claim of Lien under the Construction Lien Law, a mortgage holder (if they've gotten the appropriate spousal consent) can foreclose their mortgage, and you can lose your homestead through a tax deed if you don't pay your ad valorem taxes.  There's also a chance of losing your homestead status in Bankruptcy if the court perceives that you haven't played by the rules.

In addition, just because property is your homestead, that doesn't mean that judgments or liens against you won't be sitting there to ruin your day.  If judgments are recorded against you and you try to refinance or sell your homestead, a title company will not insure the title unless the judgments or liens are satisfied, released, or you go through a process to formally declare the property your homestead.  To do this, you have to file a declaration with the clerk of court who then mails notice to all lienholders.  A waiting period occurs and if there are no responses, you are done.  If a lienholder objects, they have to file a declaratory judgment action to determine the issue.  Objections are rare:  your property either is your homestead or it isn't.  Here's a link to the statute for removing liens before levy, which contains the basic form of the pleadings.  If a judgment holder is trying to levy against your homestead, the process  for removing liens after levy is different.

So, there it is.  Enjoy, especially the ladies.  We have a way to go, for sure;   but  I am never so happy to be living in this day and age than when I look at these old laws.

Julie

My Website 

Copyright 2012 All Rights Reserved Julie Ann Sombathy


Friday, May 11, 2012

Sandals on Friday (and one bag)

Tommy Hilfiger Bag;  Target Sandals
Due to an ear infection, I haven't been sporting many high heels.  I'm strictly flats and kittens for the foreseeable future.  Hopefully I can get back into the skyscrapers by mid-June.  I miss them.  I do love some of my flat sandals, though and as of May 1st, it is officially hot as Hades in Panama City so no worries.


I have been wearing these sandals from Target regularly.  They are comfortable, cost less than $20 and they're animal print;  therefore, they match everything.  I also picked up a new bag in TJMaxx (above).  This bag reminds me of Memorial Day, Independence Day and picnics.  Never a bad thing.



These sandals are also from Target and cost under $20.  I like the two toned blue color.  Very money.
Also from Target for little feet, I have been loving these sandals, which are so cute and they were about $13.  I love the combination of the brown leather and the pop of color.  Frances has decided she really likes that dayglo yellow color.



Bridesmaids on top, Bride on the bottom
by Steve Madden









Last but not least, I'm still digging my Steve Madden Brides, which I got on clearance late last summer for about $30. Yes, that makes me love them more.  I love the Bridesmaids too, but Brides are my faves.

Happy Weekend!

Julie

My Website


Copyright 2012 All Rights Reserved Julie Ann Sombathy


Saturday, April 21, 2012

This Isn't a Birthday Blog

I would apologize for the birthday posts, but I'm not sorry! I'm over the birthdays for a month or so, but in June, look out there will be a couple more.   Deal with it.

Anyway, I am working on a big multi-part post about shoes, copyright infringement, and more shoes....so stay tuned.  Legal stuff is on the way.

Friday, April 20, 2012

Happy Birthday to My Old Man


Today is my husband's birthday. So, this weekend is All About Bob.

Tonight we are having Veal Parm and Boston Cream Pie (his favorites). The veal has been soaking since last night and the custard is in the fridge cooling down.

Tonight is for family, per Bob's request, so after dinner we are playing Clue, Connect Four, and maybe Risk (if we can stay awake long enough for someone to complete world domination).  Hopefully my Mom will let up a little on the kids and let them win Connect Four (she's a vicious competitor).

The Beast (it grills 45 burgers at one time!)
Bob and his beloved father
Graduation, Spring Hill College 1989
Tomorrow night  is all about friends and cards.  There will be copious amounts of deer sausage on the new giant grill, cupcakes and Jack Daniels.  

If you know Bob, head over to Facebook and give him some love and then hit this LINK and vote for him for Best of Bay under the Attorney heading (third up from the bottom left).  Being nominated for Best of Bay is more special than usual for him since he has not been in private practice now for almost a year, and as I told him when I found out he was nominated, I didn't do it! 

If you don't know Bob, you should;  he's that kind of awesome.

Toys for Kids Ball 2011
Happy Birthday, Honey!


Cheers to All,

Julie

My Website






Monday, April 9, 2012

Happy Birthday to My Dad

Pop in the middle with his dog, Mike and brother, Paul.
He looks ready to throw down.
Today is my father, Tom Nolan's, 70th birthday.  I thought all day yesterday about my dad, and the things I've learned from him. I wish I could write an elegant, witty post to share with the world what an outstanding person I have for a father.  But, the words won't come so I think I'll share my Top 5 Favorite Sayings courtesy of Pop:

5.  Upon the lighting of  the candles on any one's birthday cake: "Boy, Mickey Lockwood would've loved this cake."  Mickey Lockwood is some kid Pop grew up with who would eat the candles off of a birthday cake.  I've been hearing this one since I can remember, and it never gets old.

4.  "It'll feel better when it quits hurting."  

3.  "Right of way don't mean sh*t when you're dead."  This was stated rather loudly while teaching me to drive and is a corollary to the law of gross tonnage.

2.  "I searched the world over, and thought I found true love.  You met another and thwpp you was gone.  Leave a message after the beep."  No, he didn't write the song (from the show Hee Haw, no less) but he sings it as the outgoing message on his voicemail.  That has always been my parents' message, since their first answering machine.  They've had all kinds of hilarious messages left, including one from animal control in which the singing dog catcher let them know their dog George didn't have rabies.  Top that.

And last, but not least,

1.  "Don't call me Pop!"  This, on his 50th birthday.  Of course, it stuck and twenty years later even the girls in my office all call him Pop.

Happy Birthday, Pop.  

Love,

Julie

Wednesday, April 4, 2012

These shoes by Louboutin for men are awesome sauce

Shared via TweetCaster

Jurors Misbehaving!

Jurors misbehaving is a popular topic lately, and for good reason.  Whether the misbehaving juror is deliberately trying to get released from duty, or is just a self-involved jerk, their actions are inconsiderate and disrespectful to everyone else involved in the judicial system, from the litigants to the clerks at the courthouse.

There's this guy who sent a friend request to the defendant in a civil case in order to get disqualified.  How do we know that his goal was to get dismissed?  He bragged about it on Facebook.  That worked out really well for him.  What a bonehead.

Then there's this lady, Juror #15, who posted on Facebook about the sex abuse trial of the local wrestling coach.  I've got to think that this was a pretty well covered trial, with lots of local interest.  She even name dropped the defendant's attorney.  Another attorney's wife was friends with Juror #15, and that's how the defense found out about her posts.  How could she have thought her posts would not get back to the defendant or the court?  The judge had admonished the jury in this trial not to post on social media about the case, but Juror #15 did it anyway.  She's either incredibly obtuse, or she did it on purpose to get dismissed.  Either way, she is a jerk in my book.

Then there's this genius, the jury foreman for crying out loud!  Dude, do you really think that your friends care that much where you are today?  Did you miss the part of the judge's instructions about not talking or discussing the case with anyone?  How did you think it was okay to post about "boring" cell phone evidence during the trial?  The gall. 

And last, but certainly not least, this wannabe actress who went to extreme ends to avoid jury duty.  Then she bragged about it on the radio.  What a gem.

If you have ever been in the courtroom when the judge admonishes the jury (usually every time they leave the courtroom), the instructions given are simple and easy to understand.  I'm quite sure my 9 year old would totally understand the instructions.  And given the repetition, there's no chance that a juror simply did not hear them all.

Each of these people put an entire trial in jeopardy.  First and foremost, their selfish behavior jeopardized some defendants' constitutional rights.  Moreover, it costs money to call a potential pool of jurors.  In a week with several trials scheduled, the clerk in my county might call 200 people. Did these idiots think about all of those other people who were also called for jury duty and who missed a day of work, made other arrangements for their kids, etc.? And did they think about their fellow jurors, who have missed work, family events, and put their lives on hold to serve on the jury?  That's not to mention the costs to the participants of getting ready for trial (half of which has to be redone if the trial doesn't go as scheduled).    Or the experts flown in at huge expense. Did they think about any of this when they just couldn't resist posting a status update on Facebook?

Serving as a juror is one of the few civic duties a regular person gets to perform these days.  As a people, we have clearly forgotten the importance of juror service in our country.  There's a reason the court makes everyone stand when the jury enters and leaves the courtroom.  The right to be judged by an impartial jury is one of the cornerstones of our judicial system (Sixth Amendment to the U.S. Constitution). This particular type of juror misconduct is so lazy and self-involved, it is a huge insult to the rest of us and indicative of the "let someone else do the hard work" attitude so prevalent in our society today.  For shame.

Show a little respect.


My Website